I guess what I'm saying is they didn't get any production out of IT or Crowder....nada.What? Those are the pieces they got for kyrie. They retrade those guys and got better players.
I guess what I'm saying is they didn't get any production out of IT or Crowder....nada.
So they got better players in return with this most recent deal, than what does that have to do with Kyrie?? Cause Boston looks great right now for that trade, not Cleveland.
Cavs did pretty well given the situation. Almost impossible to get fair value when dealing a top 20 guy who requests a trade. Supposedly he told them If they didn’t deal him he would get knee surgery and miss the season.
They should’ve dealt the nets pick though. No reason to leave a bullet in the holster when you’ve got LeBron. Supposedly Gilbert wants to sell the team and doesn’t want the cupboard to be bare though.
I agree with what they just got in return for IT, Crowder, Frye, and their pick.....But in regards to the Boston deal, I imagine the Celts would do the same trade over again.
They would have done better with Kyrie on their roster still, not a beat up IT or poor playing Crowder.